A Test of the Mean Distance Method for Forest Regeneration Assessment
Keywords:
sampling, plot, distance, accuracy, seedlingsAbstract
A new distance-based estimator for forest regeneration assessment, the mean distance method, was developed by combining ideas and techniques from the wandering quarter method, T-square sampling and the random pairs method. The performance of the mean distance method was compared to conventional 4.05 square meter plot sampling through simulation analysis on 405 square meter blocks of a field surveyed clumped distribution and a computer generated random distribution at different levels of density of 100, 50 and 25%. The mean distance method accurately estimated density on the random populations but the mean distance method estimates were more variable than those of 4.05 square meter plot sampling. The mean distance method overestimated actual density and was less precise than plot sampling when both methods were tested on the clumped populations. The optimum sample sizes needed for the mean distance method to achieve the same precision as 4.05 square meter plot sampling at all three density levels, for both the random and clumped spatial distributions, were at least 10 times larger than the sample size used for 4.05 square meter plot sampling.
References
Aherne, W.A., and P.J. Diggle. 1978. The estimation of neuronal population density by a robust distance method. J. of Microscopy. 114:285-293.
Catana, J.A. 1963. The wandering quarter method of estimating population density. Ecology. 44:349-360.
Cottam, G., and J.T. Curtis. 1949. A method for making rapid surveys of woodlands by means of pairs of randomly selected trees. Ecology. 30:101-104.
Cottam, G., and J.T. Curtis. 1955. Correction for various exclusion angles in the random pairs method. Ecology. 36:767.
Delince, J. 1986. Robust density estimation through distance measurements. Ecology. 67:1576-1581.
Diggle, P.J. 1975. Robust density estimation using distance methods. Biometrika. 62:39-48.
Diggle, P.J. 1977. A note on robust density estimation for spatial point patterns. Biometrika. 64:91-95.
Hanberry, B.B., S. Fraver, H.S. He, J. Yang, D.C. Dey and B.J. Palik. 2011. Spatial pattern corrections and sample sizes for forest density estimators of historical tree surveys. Landscape Ecol. 26:59-68.
Morisita, M. 1957. A new method for the estimation of density by the spacing method, applicable to non-randomly distributed populations. Seiri Seitai. 7:134-144.
Patil, S.A., K.P. Burnham, and J.L. Kovner. 1979. Nonparametric estimation of plant density by the distance method. Biometrics. 35:597-604.
Payandeh, B., and A.R. Ek. 1986. Distance methods and density estimators. Canadian J. of For. Res. 16:918-924.
Persson, O. 1971. The robustness of estimating density by distance measurements. P. 175-187 in Statistical ecology: Sampling and modeling biological populations and population dynamics, Patil, G.P., E.C. Pielou, and W.E. Waters (eds.). The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.
Pollard, J.H. 1971. On distance estimators of density in randomly distributed forests. Biometrics. 27:991-1002.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) following the publication by the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
