Tree Shape and Branch Structure: Mathematical Models
Anahtar Kelimeler:
Morphology- Woody plants- Optimization- Calculus of variationsÖz
This study of tree morphology is presented in three parts: Part 1 deals with the profile (or envelope) of trees and woody plants. Noting that most trees exhibit: (i) azimuthal symmetry about the central axis (often the main stem or bole) both in foliage and scaffolding; and (ii) decrease in leaf density from branch-end toward the central axis, a mathematical model is developed using the calculus of variations that predicts the profile, with but one free parameter. The analysis predicts profiles range from the nearly spherical in the case of uniform distribution of leaves throughout the crown, to essentially conical when the leaves are found largely on the branch-ends. The results are presented in figures showing theoretical profiles overlaid on photographs of representative trees.
Part 2 is based on field measurements that show that the cross-sectional area of a branch (or stem) entering a fork (in the direction of water transport) is less than the sum of the cross-sectional areas of the branches leaving that fork. Mathematical analysis using the calculus of variations shows that this bulking up actually reduces the quantity of plant tissue incorporated in the branching. Furthermore, it is shown that the angle of branching increases with bulking up. Field measurements are in rough agreement with this prediction.
Part 3 brings together the concepts of the first two parts to predict the cross-sectional area of the bole as a function of longitudinal position. Using equations appropriate to a tree with a single main stem and horizontal side branches, the cross-sectional area of the bole is calculated. The results compare favorably with field measurements.
Referanslar
Bell, Adrian D. and Alan Bryan. 1991. Plant Form: An Illustrated Guide to Plant Morphology. Oxford. 341p.
Berninger, Frank, Lluis Coll, Petteri Vanninen, Annikki Makela, Sari Palmroth, and Eero Nikinmaa. 2005. Effects of tree size and position in pipe model ratios in Scots pine. Can. J. For. Res. 35:1294-1304.
Emerson, Robert. 1929. Photosynthesis as a function of light intensity and of temperature with different concentrations of chlorophyll. Journal of General Physiology 12(5): 623-639.
Hall, D. O. and K. K. Rao. 1999. Photosynthesis, Sixth Edition. Cambridge. 214p.
Horn, Henry S. 1971. Trees, Princeton. 144p.
Kantola, Anu, Harri Makinen, and Annikki Makela. 2007. Stem form and branchiness of Norway spruce as a sawn timber - Predicted by a process based model. Forest Ecology and Management 241:209-222.
Makela, Annikki. 2002. Derivation of stem taper from pipe theory in a carbon balance framework. Tree Physiology 22:891-905.
Makela, Annikki and Harry Valentine. 2006. Crown Ratio Influences Allometric Scaling in Trees. Ecology 87:2967-2972.
Mitchell, Kenneth J. 1975a. Dynamic and simulated yield of Douglas-fir. For. Sci. Monogr. 21(4):1-40.
Mitchell, Kenneth J. 1975b. Stand description and growth simulation from low-level stereo photos of tree crowns. J. For., January:12-17.
Rennolls, Keith. 1994. Pipe-model theory of stem-profile development. Forest Ecology and Management. 69:41-55.
Savage, V. M., L.P. Bentley, B. J. Enquist, J. S. Sperry, D. D. Smith, P. B. Reich, and E. I. von Allmen. 2010. Hydraulic trade-offs and space filling enable better predictions of vascular structure and function in plants. PNAS 107(107):22722-22727.
Shigo, Alex L. 1994. Tree Anatomy, Shigo and Trees, Associates. 104p.
Shinozaki, K., K. Yoda, K. Hozumi, and T. Kira (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant form: the pipe model theory. I. basic analyses. Japanese Journal of Ecology 14:97-105.
Tausch, Robin J. 2009. A Structurally Based Analytic Model for Estimation of Biomass and Fuel Loads of Woodland Trees. Natural Resource Modeling, 22(4): 463-488.
Thomas, Peter. 2000. Trees: Their Natural History. Cambridge. 286p.
Tiangco, Peter N. and Bruce C. Forester. 2000. Development of trunk-canopy biomass and morphology indicies from quadpolarized radar. URL: http://gisdevelopment.net/aars/acrs/2000/ts12/ts1203pf.htm
Valentine, Harry. 1985. Tree growth models: Derivations employing the pipe-model theory. J. theor. Biol. 117: 579-585.
Valentine, Harry T., Anthony R. Ludlow, and George M. Furnival. 1994. Modeling crown rise in even-aged stands of Sitka spruce or loblolly pine. Forest Ecology and Management 69:189-197.
Valentine, Harry and Annikki Makela. 2005. Bridging process-based and empirical approaches to modeling tree growth. Tree Physiology 25:769-779.
Wang, Mingliang and Kieth Rennolls. 2007. Bivariate Distribution Modeling with Tree Diameter and Height Data. Forest Science 53:16-24.
Waring, R. H., P. E. Schroeder, and R. Owen. 1982. Applications of pipe model theory to predict canopy leaf area. Can. J. For. Res. 12:556-560.
West, G. B., J. H. Brown, and B. J. Enquist. 1997. A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology. Science 276:122-126.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) following the publication by the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
